Using natural language processing to characterize and predict homeopathic product-associated adverse events in consumer reviews: comparison to reports to FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Konkel K., Oner N., Ahmed A., Jones S. C., Berner E. S., Zengul F. D.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, cilt.31, sa.1, ss.70-78, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 31 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/jamia/ocad197
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Applied Science & Technology Source, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CINAHL, Computer & Applied Sciences, Information Science and Technology Abstracts, INSPEC, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA), MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.70-78
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Apply natural language processing (NLP) to Amazon consumer reviews to identify adverse events (AEs) associated with unapproved over the counter (OTC) homeopathic drugs and compare findings with reports to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Materials and methods: Data were extracted from publicly available Amazon reviews and analyzed using JMP 16 Pro Text Explorer. Topic modeling identified themes. Sentiment analysis (SA) explored consumer perceptions. A machine learning model optimized prediction of AEs in reviews. Reports for the same time interval and product class were obtained from the FAERS public dashboard and analyzed.Results: Homeopathic cough/cold products were the largest category common to both data sources (Amazon = 616, FAERS = 445) and were analyzed further. Oral symptoms and unpleasant taste were described in both datasets. Amazon reviews describing an AE had lower Amazon ratings (X-2 = 224.28, P < .0001). The optimal model for predicting AEs was Neural Boosted 5-fold combining topic modeling and Amazon ratings as predictors (mean AUC = 0.927).Discussion: Topic modeling and SA of Amazon reviews provided information about consumers' perceptions and opinions of homeopathic OTC cough and cold products. Amazon ratings appear to be a good indicator of the presence or absence of AEs, and identified events were similar to FAERS.Conclusion: Amazon reviews may complement traditional data sources to identify AEs associated with unapproved OTC homeopathic products. This study is the first to use NLP in this context and lays the groundwork for future larger scale efforts.