A general overview and comparative interpretation on element-specific X-ray spectroscopy techniques: XPS, XAS, and XRS


KETENOĞLU D.

X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, cilt.51, sa.5-6, ss.422-443, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 51 Sayı: 5-6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/xrs.3299
  • Dergi Adı: X-RAY SPECTROMETRY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, Analytical Abstracts, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), Chemical Abstracts Core, Communication Abstracts, Index Islamicus, INSPEC, Metadex, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.422-443
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray Raman scattering spectroscopy, LITHIUM-ION BATTERY, RAMAN-SCATTERING SPECTROSCOPY, ABSORPTION-SPECTROSCOPY, IN-SITU, PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY, ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE, OXIDATION-STATE, EARTH MATERIALS, PROPYLENE CARBONATE, EDGE
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray Raman scattering (XRS) spectroscopy are the element-specific tools providing local electronic and chemical structure insights. XPS is widely used for qualitative/quantitative surface analysis of solids and replaced by synchrotron-based ambient pressure-XPS and hard-XPS to benefit from the advantages of near-ambient pressures and hard X-rays to study complex sample environments. XAS is a well-established soft and hard X-ray probe to examine the coordination, spin and oxidation states in solids, liquids and gases with high resolutions and short data acquisition time. XRS, using the hard X-rays of similar to 10 keV, is preferred to conventional XAS and XPS in the study of soft X-ray absorption edges such as C, O, Li Kedges bulk-sensitively in vacuum-free medium for energy storage systems during working operations, inner Earth elements under realistic conditions, probing chemical and biological reactions in the liquid phase, C speciation in archeological and paleontological samples and direct tomography. In this study, first the basics of XPS, XAS, and XRS techniques with their advantages and limitations are introduced to provide a general overview. In the Results and Discussion, the particular emphasis is given to the comparison of XPS, XAS, and XRS with the interpretation of the spectroscopic signatures for organic carbonate-based electrolytes. The computed C 1 s binding energy shifts for ethylene carbonate (EC), propylene carbonate (PC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), and diethyl carbonate (DEC) are presented to discuss the XPS peak assignments and the performed C K-edge XRS measurements of 1 M LiPF6 in DMC and EC are given for a detailed discussion of the XRS spectra. C 1 s XPS, C K-edge XAS, and XRS of PC from the literature are discussed to interpret the spectra of each technique comparatively.