Comparative Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms for Bragg Peak Estimation in Polymeric Materials for Tissue-Sparing Radiotherapy


Creative Commons License

Açıcı K.

POLYMERS, cilt.17, sa.15, ss.1-37, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 17 Sayı: 15
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/polym17152068
  • Dergi Adı: POLYMERS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, Chemical Abstracts Core, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Directory of Open Access Journals, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-37
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Proton therapy has emerged as a highly precise and tissue-sparing radiotherapy technique, capitalizing on the unique energy deposition pattern of protons characterized by the Bragg peak. Ensuring treatment accuracy relies on calibration phantoms, often composed of tissue-equivalent polymeric materials. This study investigates the dosimetric behavior of four commonly used polymers—Parylene, Epoxy, Lexan, and Mylar—by analyzing their linear energy transfer (LET) values and Bragg curve characteristics across various proton energies. Experimental LET data were collected and used to train and evaluate the predictive power for Bragg peak of multiple artificial intelligence models, including kNN, SVR, MLP, RF, LWRF, XGBoost, 1D-CNN, LSTM, and BiLSTM. These algorithms were optimized using 10-fold cross-validation and assessed through statistical error and performance metrics including MAERAERMSERRSECC, and R2. Results demonstrate that certain AI models, particularly RF and LWRF, accurately (in terms of all evaluation metrics) predict Bragg peaks in Epoxy polymers, reducing the reliance on costly and time-consuming simulations. In terms of CC and R2 metrics, the LWRF model demonstrated superior performance, achieving scores of 0.9969 and 0.9938, respectively. However, when evaluated against MAERMSERAE, and RRSE metrics, the RF model emerged as the top performer, yielding values of 12.3161, 15.8223, 10.3536, and 11.4389, in the same order. Additionally, the SVR model achieved the highest number of statistically significant differences when compared pairwise with the other eight models, showing significance against six of them. The findings support the use of AI as a robust tool for designing reliable calibration phantoms and optimizing proton therapy planning. This integrative approach enhances the synergy between materials science, medical physics, and data-driven modeling in advanced radiotherapy systems.