From Land Consolidation to Diversification: Cost Recovery and Agricultural Transition in Rural Türkiye


Ercan O., Tursun A., Ercan E.

Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, cilt.32, sa.1, ss.186-201, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus, TRDizin) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 32 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.15832/ankutbd.1758003
  • Dergi Adı: Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM), Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.186-201
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Agricultural policy, Cost recovery, Crop diversification, Land consolidation, Rural transformation, Spatial equity
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The present study explores how land consolidation (LC) can bring about meaningful changes in rural Türkiye, with a particular attention to cost recovery and the diversification following consolidation. Using the case of Ikitepe Village, it shows that LC is more than just reorganizing land boundaries; it acts as a strategic policy tool that helps reshape rural areas. The project resulted in a 50% reduction in the number of parcels, nearly eliminated shared ownership, and enhanced mechanization suitability from 40% to 99%. These changes helped improve land use efficiency, farming infrastructure, and ownership clarity. Alongside these technical outcomes, the study observed a notable shift toward high-value crops, suggesting that farmers are now making more market-oriented choices. The fact that investment costs were recovered within 41 months points to the strong economic feasibility of such projects. While research on either economic returns or cropping patterns exists, it is rare to find studies that examine both together. By placing Türkiye’s experience within a broader global context, this study calls attention to the importance of forward-thinking, inclusive planning that continues even after the physical work of consolidation ends. It highlights LC not just as a technical intervention but as a key to rural transformation, connecting land use, fairness, and agricultural modernization.