Comparison of Frontline FOLFIRINOX with Fluorouracil-Based and Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapies in Metastatic Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)


Kalem A., Kus T., Gokcek S., ÜNEK İ. T., Sahin T. K., DİZDAR Ö., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Clinical Medicine, cilt.14, sa.16, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 16
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/jcm14165868
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: ampullary tumors, FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine-based, intestinal subtype, metastatic, pancreaticobiliary subtype
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Adenocarcinoma arising from the ampulla of Vater is an extremely rare neoplasm, and there are limited data regarding frontline therapy for metastatic disease. We investigated the outcomes of first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX by comparing it with other treatments in patients with advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma. Methods: We included 123 patients with advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma who were treated with frontline FOLFIRINOX (n = 32), fluorouracil (FU)-based chemotherapy (n = 20), and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (n = 65) between August 2007 and January 2024 in this retrospective study. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) according to treatment and clinicopathological features were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The median age of the patients was 62 years (range, 36–78), and 75,6% of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 0–1. The mOS were 13 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), 11 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), and 12 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), respectively [p = 0.865]. There were no significant differences in OS among the chemotherapeutic agents according to histological subtypes. However, FOLFIRINOX and FU-based treatments appeared more effective in the intestinal subtype, while gemcitabine-based therapies were less effective. In the pancreaticobiliary subtype, FU-based therapies yielded a shorter outcome compared to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based therapies. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: In advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma, despite higher toxicity, frontline FOLFIRINOX showed a trend toward an OS benefit in the intestinal subtype while providing a similar outcome in the pancreaticobiliary subtype.