Measurable residual disease response in acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax and azacitidine.

Pratz K., Jonas B. A., Pullarkat V., Recher C., Schuh A. C., Thirman M. J., ...Daha Fazla

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, cilt.39, sa.15_suppl, ss.7018, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Özet
  • Cilt numarası: 39 Sayı: 15_suppl
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.7018
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, PASCAL, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, Gender Studies Database, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.7018
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

7018 Background: In the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, rates of composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and measurable residual disease response (MRD<10-3) were higher in patients (pts) treated with venetoclax (Ven) + azacitidine (Aza) compared to Aza alone (23.4%/7.6%, p<0.001). There is limited evidence of the clinical significance of MRD monitoring in pts receiving low-intensity chemotherapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of pts treated with Ven+Aza who achieved both CRc and MRD<10-3 in the VIALE-A trial (NCT02993523). Methods: Enrolled pts were ≥18 years and unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Pts received Ven 400 mg orally; days 1–28 and Aza 75 mg/m2; days 1-7/28-day cycle. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments by integrated leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and different than normal procedures were collected for central analysis (Covance Central Laboratory Services) at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Assessments were performed independent of disease responses. MRD response was defined as <1 residual blast /1000 leukocytes (<10-3). CRc, DoR, OS, and EFS were assessed. Disease assessments were per modified International Working Group response criteria for AML. Results: 211/286 (74%) pts treated with Ven+Aza with at least one valid post-baseline MRD assessment were considered MRD evaluable; 78/211 (37%) achieved MRD<10-3 and 133/211 (63%) had MRD≥10-3. Median age (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) was 76 (range: 49-89)/77 (58-91) yrs. Pts (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) received median of 14.5 (range: 1-28) /7.0 (1-30) cycles of Ven+Aza. At median follow-up of 22.0 (range: 20.1-23.0)/20.8 (19.8-22.3) months (mos), CRc + MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3 was achieved by 67 (86%)/ 97 (73%); 20/67 (30%) achieved CRc + MRD<10-3 by end of cycle 1. Median DoR, OS, and EFS were not reached in pts with CRc + MRD<10-3 response (Table). The 12-mo estimates for DoR, OS, and EFS for pts with CRc + MRD<10-3response were 81.2%, 94.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Adverse events ≥grade 3 (MRD<10-3/ MRD≥10-3) were febrile neutropenia (50%/43%), neutropenia (50%/35%), and thrombocytopenia (44%/44%), similar to the overall population. Conclusions: Pts with best response of CRc who achieved MRD<10-3 response with Ven+Aza treatment had longer DoR, OS, and EFS than pts who were CRc and MRD positive. Clinical trial information: NCT02993523. [Table: see text]