Evaluation of the Remineralisation and Antibacterial Properties of Propolis, Chitosan, and Theobromine


Yazan Sukur E., GÜVEN Y., TOPCUOĞLU E. N., BATU Ş., ORHAN K., TUNA İNCE E. B.

Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, cilt.24, ss.395-404, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2706
  • Dergi Adı: Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.395-404
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: antibacterial, chitosan, propolis, remineralisation, theobromine
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: This study evaluated the remineralisation potential of the natural compounds propolis, chitosan, and theobromine on artificial initial carious lesions and investigated their antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities. Methods and Materials: Artificial lesions were induced on buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of 14 extracted molars through a 72-h demineralisation process. Specimens were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 4): propolis (100, 200 μg/mL), chitosan (1.25, 2.5 mg/ml), theobromine (100, 200 mg/L), and artificial saliva (control). Mineral density was assessed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline, after demineralisation, and after pH cycling. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution, and antibiofilm effects were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results: Micro-CT showed that both propolis groups exhibited mineral gain and % remineralisation values similar to the negative control, whereas chitosan and theobromine groups had significantly higher values (P < 0.05). MIC values were 100 μg/ml for propolis and 0.15 mg/ml for chitosan, while theobromine showed no effect. Quantitative CLSM analysis revealed that only the propolis 200 μg/ml group had a significantly lower total biomass compared to the negative control (P < 0.05). Additionally, both propolis groups demonstrated a significantly higher dead/live cell ratio than the negative control groups (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences in dead/live cell ratios were observed among the chitosan, theobromine, and negative control groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Chitosan and theobromine exhibited favourable outcomes in terms of remineralisation; however, their antimicrobial efficacy remained limited. In contrast, propolis exhibited promising antibacterial activity but lacked significant remineralisation capability.