Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies


Creative Commons License

Wu Y., Levis B., Sun Y., Krishnan A., He C., Riehm K. E., ...Daha Fazla

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, cilt.129, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 129
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109892
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, ASSIA, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, Gender Studies Database, MEDLINE, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Psycinfo
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Depressive disorders, Diagnostic interviews, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Individual participant data meta-analysis, Major depression, VALIDITY, SCHEDULES, ACCURACY
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D).