Assessing the Influence of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Evidence from a Ribociclib-Dominant Cohort

Erul E., ÖKSÜZ N. E., AKKUŞ E., KUBİLAY TOLUNAY P., KÖKSOY E. B., YAŞAR H. A.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), cilt.61, sa.11, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 61 Sayı: 11
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/medicina61111960
  • Dergi Adı: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: bioavailability, CDK4/6 inhibitors, drug–drug interactions, endocrine therapy, HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, palbociclib, progression-free survival, proton pump inhibitors, real-world observational study, ribociclib
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background and Objectives: Endocrine therapy combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors are widely recognized as the standard first-line approach for treating hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Nonetheless, potential pharmacokinetic interactions-particularly with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)-have raised concerns about reduced drug bioavailability and compromised therapeutic efficacy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 92 patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received either ribociclib or palbociclib between 2019 and 2024 at a single tertiary care center. Patients were stratified according to whether they were concurrently using PPIs during CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. The primary endpoint assessed was progression-free survival (PFS). The study population was dominated by ribociclib users, and the results primarily apply to ribociclib; the palbociclib analyses are descriptive only due to the very small numbers (n = 6). Results: The median PFS was significantly shorter in patients who received concomitant PPI therapy compared with those who did not (5.6 vs. 24.4 months; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified PPI use, endocrine resistance, and the presence of three or more metastatic sites as independent predictors of reduced PFS. In the ribociclib-only cohort (n = 86), the association persisted (adjusted HR 6.36, 95% CI 3.02-13.37, p < 0.001). No notable differences in toxicity profiles were observed between the groups. Conclusions: In this ribociclib-dominant real-world cohort, concomitant PPI use was associated with shorter PFS, and the findings primarily apply to ribociclib. Given the potential for confounding by the indication/comorbidity inherent to retrospective studies, the results should be interpreted as associational. These data support the cautious use of non-essential PPIs during ribociclib therapy and underscore the need for prospective agent-specific pharmacokinetic studies.