Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse

ŞÜKÜR Y. E., DÖKMECİ F., ÇETİNKAYA Ş. E., SEVAL M. M.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, cilt.247, ss.127-131, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 247
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.017
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.127-131
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Laparoscopy, McCall, Culdoplasty, Sacrohysteropexy, Uterine preservation, Uterine prolapse, Vaginal hysterectomy, UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE, ORGAN PROLAPSE, CULDOPLASTY, QUESTIONNAIRES, HYSTEROPEXY, WOMEN
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To compare medium/long-term outcomes in terms of pelvic floor function, patient reported prolapse recurrence and repeat prolapse surgery after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) and vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension (VH&McCall) which is the most commonly performed surgical option for severe uterine prolapse from past to present.