Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse

ŞÜKÜR, YAVUZ; DÖKMECİ, FULYA; ÇETİNKAYA, ŞERİFE; SEVAL, MEHMET

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.017

Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse

ŞÜKÜR Y. E., DÖKMECİ F., ÇETİNKAYA Ş. E., SEVAL M. M.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, cilt.247, ss.127-131, 2020 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 247
Basım Tarihi: 2020
Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.017
Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.127-131
Anahtar Kelimeler: Laparoscopy, McCall, Culdoplasty, Sacrohysteropexy, Uterine preservation, Uterine prolapse, Vaginal hysterectomy, UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE, ORGAN PROLAPSE, CULDOPLASTY, QUESTIONNAIRES, HYSTEROPEXY, WOMEN
Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To compare medium/long-term outcomes in terms of pelvic floor function, patient reported prolapse recurrence and repeat prolapse surgery after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) and vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension (VH&McCall) which is the most commonly performed surgical option for severe uterine prolapse from past to present.