Evaluation of serum SuPAR levels in sepsis and septic shock patients in terms of diagnosis and prognosis


Creative Commons License

Koçak C.

The 43rd FEBS Congress, Praha, Çek Cumhuriyeti, 7 - 12 Temmuz 2018

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Praha
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Çek Cumhuriyeti
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Sepsis is accompanied by physiological, pathological, biochemical abnormalities induced by infection and is a public

health problem. It is the leading cause of mortality. Septic shock is defined as the need for a vasopressor to keep the mean

arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and serum lactate level above 2 mmol / L (> 18 mg / dL) in the absence of

hypovolaemia.

SuPAR (soluble urokinasetype

plasminogen activator receptor) plays a role in the migration of cells such as monocytes,

macrophages from the circulation to the tissues.

In this study, the effects of SuPAR on sepsis and septic shock diagnosis and prognosis were evaluated by comparison with

the currently used CRP (Creactive

protein), PCT (procalcitonin), APACHE 2 score of sepsis and septic shock patients

enrolled in intensive care unit.

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 21.0 program.

Categorical variables were compared with Pearson Chisquare,

Yates corrected Chisquare

and Fisher tests and

Continuous variables were compared with nonparametric tests (MannWhitney

U test and KruskalWallis

test) since did

not fit normal distribution. The relationship between variables was assessed using the Spearman Correlation Test. The

decisionmaking

characteristics of the variables were examined by ROC curve analysis.

In our study, serum SuPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with sepsis (n = 26) and septic shock (n = 23)

compared to healthy controls (n = 25)The serum SuPAR levels were similar in the survivors and nonsurvivors at the end

of the 7 day / 28 day followup

and in the intensive care unit. When all groups were taken into consideration, we

determined significant correlations between the levels of SuPAR and CRP, PCT. There was no correlation between

variables in patient groups.

Our findings suggest that SuPAR may be used to diagnose sepsis and septic shock, but not enough to discriminate

between sepsis septic shock and predict prognosis.