Effect of Post-Activation Potentiation on Sprint Performance after Combined Electromyostimulation and Back Squats

Creative Commons License

Sari C., Koz M., Salcman V., Gabrys T., Karayiğit R.

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, cilt.12, sa.3, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 12 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/app12031481
  • Dergi Adı: APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Communication Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Directory of Open Access Journals, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: PAP, preconditioning, warm-up, individual response, explosive force, NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION, POSTACTIVATION POTENTIATION, MUSCLE STRENGTH, POWER, RECRUITMENT, SIZE, JUMP
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon which can improve force performance executed after a previous conditioning activity. PAP is usually evoked through heavy resistance, but many new methods are being suggested that acutely improve performance in post-activation potentiation protocols. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of simultaneous application of Smith machine back squats (BS) with electromyostimulation (EMS) on sprint performance. Sixteen male (age = 22.9 +/- 2.3 years, body mass = 79.9 +/- 13.8 kg, BS one-repetition maximum (1 RM) = 120.5 +/- 17.3) amateur football and rugby players volunteered for this study. Participants randomly performed PAP protocols (CON = no load, BS = 3 x 85% of 1 RM BS, EMS = 3 x weightless squat with electric current and BS + EMS = 3 x 85% 1 RM BS with electric current) on four different days with at least 48 h intervals. Participants rested passively for 7 min after preloads and performed the 30 m sprint test. Sprint times for 10 and 30 m were recorded for each condition. As a result, no significant difference was found in the 10 m (p = 0.13) and 30 m (p = 0.10) sprint performance between the preload protocols. The effect size was found to be trivial (eta p(2): 0.13 for 10 m; eta p(2): 0.11 for 30 m). In individual results, the 10 m sprint performance of five participants and 30 m sprint performance of two participants decreased in BS, EMS, or BS + EMS conditions compared with CON. No PAP effect in other participants was observed. In conclusion, preloads did not affect 10 m and 30 m sprint performance of football and rugby players. It can be said that the applied PAP protocols or physical exertion alone may cause fatigue in some individuals.