Knowledge and clinical attitudes regarding temporomandibular disorders among orthodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons
CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1080/08869634.2026.2733447
- Dergi Adı: CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO)
- Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective To compare temporomandibular disorder (TMDs) knowledge and clinical attitudes between orthodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS).Methods This cross-sectional study included 160 participants (80 per specialty) in T & uuml;rkiye. A 41-item online questionnaire assessed knowledge across four domains and clinical attitudes. Responses were compared with expert reference rates and between specialties.Results Both groups showed substantial knowledge deficiencies, particularly in pathophysiology and chronic pain. OMFS demonstrated significantly higher correct-response rates than orthodontists across multiple items in all four knowledge domains, whereas orthodontists performed better on one pathophysiology item. Clinical attitudes were generally positive; OMFS more frequently supported patient information and counseling, while orthodontists more frequently favored referral of suspected TMD cases.Conclusion Despite positive clinical attitudes, important TMD knowledge gaps persist in both specialties, with OMFS showing greater overall knowledge. Postgraduate education should reinforce evidence-based, diagnosis-driven, and biopsychosocial TMD management.