Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma as a Scaffold in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment


BEZGİN T., Yilmaz A. D., Celik B. N., KOLSUZ M. E., Sonmez H.

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, cilt.41, sa.1, ss.36-44, 2015 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 41 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2015
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.004
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.36-44
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Blood clot, immature teeth, platelet-rich plasma, regenerative endodontic treatment, IMMATURE PERMANENT TOOTH, APICAL PERIODONTITIS, NECROTIC PULP, TREATMENT REVASCULARIZATION, OPEN APEX, TEETH, REVITALIZATION, OUTCOMES, MOLARS
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: Current research is concerned with discovering better scaffolds for use in regenerative endodontic treatment. This study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) used as a scaffold in regenerative endodontic treatment and compare it with that of a conventional blood clot (BC) scaffold. Methods: A total of 20 necrotic, single-rooted immature teeth were randomly distributed into 2 groups. After disinfecting the root canal space with triple antibiotic paste (1:1:1 ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and cefaclor), a tissue scaffold was created by using either PRP or BC and covered with white mineral trioxide aggregate. Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations were performed once every 3 months during an 18-month period. Differences in root area were calculated from preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate differences between groups, with P value <.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results: All 20 teeth were clinically asymptomatic during 18-month follow-up period; however, 1 tooth in the BC group exhibited periapical pathosis and was judged radiographically unsuccessful. Complete apical closure was observed in a mean of 8.1 months in the PRP group compared with 9 months in the BC group. The PRP group exhibited 9.86% increase in root area, compared with 12.6% increase in the BC group. The difference in success rates between the groups was not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusions: PRP successfully created a scaffold for regenerative endodontic treatment; however, treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between PRP and conventional BC scaffold.