Impact of exogenous salicylic acid on the growth, antioxidant activity and physiology of carrot plants subjected to combined salinity and boron toxicity

Eraslan F., Inal A., Gunes A., Alpaslan M.

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, cilt.113, sa.2, ss.120-128, 2007 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 113 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2007
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.03.012
  • Dergi Adı: SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.120-128
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: antioxidants, ascorbate peroxidase, B toxicity, catalase, salicylic acid, salinity, PROLINE ACCUMULATION, MINERAL-COMPOSITION, HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE, OXIDATIVE STRESS, WHEAT SEEDLINGS, ASCORBIC-ACID, GAS-EXCHANGE, EXCESS BORON, NACL STRESS, RESPONSES
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Previous studies have shown that salicylic acid (SA) plays a role in the response of plants to salt and osmotic stresses. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of exogenous salicylic acid on the growth, physiology and antioxidant activity of carrot (Daucus carota L. cv. Nantes) grown under combined stress of salinity and boron toxicity. The treatments consisted of salt (control, NaCl, and Na2SO4), boron (-B: 0 and +B: 25 mg B kg(-1)) and salicylic acid (-SA: 0 and +SA: 0.5 mmol SA kg(-1)). The diameter of the storage root was increased by NaCl salinity in the absence of B toxicity, however, it was increased by Na2SO4 salinity under B toxicity. For the storage root yield, NaCl salinity was more toxic than Na2SO4 salinity. With its role in plant growth regulation, SA application positively affected the storage root dry weight, S concentration, carotenoids and anthocyanin content and increased the total antioxidant activity (AA) of the shoot and storage root. SA application regulated proline and toxic ion (B, Cl) accumulation in the storage root and shoot. This study reports the long term effects of SA under stress conditions and reveals that SA was not as effective as in alleviating abiotic stress as reported in the literature conducted with short-term studies. That means longterm effects of SA would be significantly different from its short-term effects. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.