Dual minimal invasive approach for intravesical mid-urethral sling erosion: combining suprapubic and cystoscopic techniques


Creative Commons License

Turgay B., Varlı B.

ESGE 34 th Annual Congress, İstanbul, Türkiye, 19 - 22 Ekim 2025, ss.366, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.366
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background

A 60-year-old patient presented to our clinic in October 2024 with complaints of urinary

incontinence, recurrent urinary tract infection, and pelvic pain. The patient's medical history revealed

previous surgeries, including two midurethral sling procedures performed approximately ten years

ago, six months apart. The procedures were performed via transobturator and retropubic

approaches, respectively. Pelvic ultrasonography revealed that the mesh had eroded into the bladder

and extended into the bladder lumen. Considering the severity of the patient's current symptoms

and the localization of the mesh, removal of the eroded mesh was planned via a transvesical

approach through two trocars inserted from the suprapubic area under cystoscopic guidance.

Following surgical removal of the mesh, the patient's pain resolved; however, urinary incontinence

persisted. Considering the history of multiple prior surgeries for urinary incontinence, a periurethral

bulking agent injection was attempted as a treatment. After the injection, the patient reported a

noticeable improvement in urinary leakage.

Methods

While the bladder and the intravesical mesh were being visualized under cystoscopic guidance, the

procedure was initiated by transvesically inserting two 3 mm trocars into the bladder, which had

been distended with saline and elevated toward the suprapubic area. Following this, the mesh ends

protruding into the bladder were identified, grasped, and freed using a grasper and scissors inserted

through the trocars, and subsequently extracted transurethrally.

Results

The procedure was completed without complications. No recurrent erosion of the bladder mucosa by

the mesh was observed within the 3-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

Using either the abdominal or transvaginal approach to excise eroded mesh requires subsequent

closure of the bladder defect, causing more trauma to the patient. Consequently, we preferred a

new, minimally invasive treatment for mesh erosion into the bladder.