Gender-Specific Variations in Greater Palatine Foramen Anatomy: Insights from CBCT Scans in the North Cyprus Population


Fahrioglu S. L., Firincioglulari M., ORHAN K.

Medical Science Monitor, cilt.30, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 30
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.12659/msm.945466
  • Dergi Adı: Medical Science Monitor
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, MEDLINE
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Anatomy, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Maxilla
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The greater palatine foramen (GPF) is anatomically located distal to the third maxillary molar tooth, midway between the midline of the palate and the dental arch. The GPF contains the major palatine artery, vein, and nerve, traversing the palatine sulcus. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical position of the GPF in 93 women and 67 men at a single center in Cyprus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material/Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 CBCT scans. Measurements of the GPF’s horizontal and vertical diameters, distances from GPF to the incisive foramen, posterior nasal spine, anterior nasal spine, and midaxillary suture, and positional relationships to molars were recorded. Statistical analyses compared these measurements between males and females. Results: The study included 93 females and 67 males with an average age of 46.6 (±11.6) years. Significant sex differences were observed in most GPF measurements, with males showing larger dimensions such as the anteri- or nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, mid-maxillary suture, and incisive foramen to the GPF. The GPF was predominantly located in the third molar region (96.25% on the right, 96.9% on the left). The left GPF showed a significantly larger horizontal diameter than the right (P<0.05). Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the average distances from the anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, mid-maxillary suture, and incisive foramen to the GPF, as well as in the size of the GPF, between males and females. Recognizing these variations enhances clinical planning and reduces the risk of complications.