Analysis of taxonomic and geographic patterns of Turkish Veronica orientalis using nuclear and plastid DNA and morphological data

Sonibare M. A., ARMAĞAN M., Özgökçe F., YAPRAK A. E., Mayland-Quellhorst E., Albach D. C.

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, cilt.300, sa.4, ss.645-664, 2014 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 300 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2014
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00606-013-0909-4
  • Dergi Adı: PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.645-664
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Veronica, AFLP, cpDNA, Morphology, Polyploidy, Turkey, FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM, MULTIPLE ORIGINS, PHYLOGENETIC NETWORKS, RETICULATE EVOLUTION, CHROMOSOME-NUMBERS, GENETIC DIVERSITY, PLANT DIVERSITY, TURKEY, PLANTAGINACEAE, AFLP
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Veronica orientalis and related species form one of the taxonomically most challenging subgroups within the genus Veronica. Hybridization and polyploidization on the one hand and convergent character evolution on the other have made delimitation of species difficult. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms and plastid DNA markers were used in conjunction with 54 morphological characters to study relationships among 35 accessions of V. orientalis Mill. as well as other closely related species of Veronica occurring in Turkey and adjacent areas of Georgia and Armenia. In addition, ploidy levels were estimated for 15 accessions using flow cytometry. Diploid to hexaploid individuals were detected in V. orientalis. Analysis of DNA markers demonstrated the non-monophyly of V. orientalis, especially with regard to V. fuhsii and V. multifida from Eastern Turkey, but nuclear and plastid DNA markers are largely incongruent. Neither demonstrates a clear biogeographic pattern. The morphological analysis reveals the distinction of V. orientalis subsp. carduchorum, which is weakly retrieved in some molecular analyses and some clustering according to geography. V. multifida is not monophyletic likely due to parallel evolution of pinnatifid leaves east and west of the Anatolian diagonal.