Ibis, M. A. Et Al. 2022. Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation. International Urology and Nephrology , vol.54, no.9 , 2141-2148.

Ibis, M. A., GÖKCE, M. İ., Babayigit, M., Yitgin, Y., Karagoz, M. A., Boyuk, A., ... Verep, S.(2022). Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation. International Urology and Nephrology , vol.54, no.9, 2141-2148.

Ibis, MUHAMMED Et Al. "Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation," International Urology and Nephrology , vol.54, no.9, 2141-2148, 2022

Ibis, MUHAMMED A. Et Al. "Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation." International Urology and Nephrology , vol.54, no.9, pp.2141-2148, 2022

Ibis, M. A. Et Al. (2022) . "Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation." International Urology and Nephrology , vol.54, no.9, pp.2141-2148.

@article{article, author={MUHAMMED ARİF İBİŞ Et Al. }, title={Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ın the management of relatively large (20–30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation}, journal={International Urology and Nephrology}, year=2022, pages={2141-2148} }