F. DÖKMECİ Et Al. , "Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence," NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4, pp.518-521, 2010
DÖKMECİ, F. Et Al. 2010. Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4 , 518-521.
DÖKMECİ, F., SEVAL, M. M., & GÖK, H., (2010). Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4, 518-521.
DÖKMECİ, FULYA, MEHMET MURAT SEVAL, And HAYDAR GÖK. "Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence," NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4, 518-521, 2010
DÖKMECİ, FULYA Et Al. "Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence." NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4, pp.518-521, 2010
DÖKMECİ, F. SEVAL, M. M. And GÖK, H. (2010) . "Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence." NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS , vol.29, no.4, pp.518-521.
@article{article, author={FULYA DÖKMECİ Et Al. }, title={Comparison of Ambulatory Versus Conventional Urodynamics in Females With Urinary Incontinence}, journal={NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS}, year=2010, pages={518-521} }